| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Get rid of sk_protinfo use in rose |
| From: | Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:58:40 +0000 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050321095037.GA10220@linux-mips.org> |
| References: | <20050321095037.GA10220@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:50:37AM +0000, Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote: > Below patch puts struct sock into rose_cb to get rid of the need for the > use of sk_protinfo in rose_sk(). While we're touching the data structure > convert it from a typedef into a struct. The previous two patches leave the same thing to do in ax25 also - where it's a more complicated thing to do since currently an ax25_cb may exist without a struct sock - which unfortunately messes up locking. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Get rid of sk_protinfo use in rose, Ralf Baechle DL5RB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Get rid of sk_protinfo use in rose, Ralf Baechle DL5RB |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Get rid of sk_protinfo use in rose, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |