Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

netdev

Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
From:	"chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:24:11 -0500
Cc:	shemminger@xxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050316181532.GA3251@stusta.de>
Reply-to:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to:	chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

In message <20050316181532.GA3251@xxxxxxxxx>,Adrian Bunk writes:
>Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good 
>idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM 
>support.

i agree.

>Moving the hooks to the bridge code will give you exactly the same 
>problems the other way round.

how about moving them to a third location like net/core/dev.c?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk Message not available Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk Message not available Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, chas williams - CONTRACTOR <= Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, chas williams - CONTRACTOR Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Stephen Hemminger

Previous by Date:	Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Chris Wedgwood
Next by Date:	Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Francois Romieu
Previous by Thread:	Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk
Next by Thread:	Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, chas williams - CONTRACTOR
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]