| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Feyd <feyd@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W |
| From: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:15:44 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050316162448.GR17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> |
| References: | <422F118D.8070704@voicenet.com> <20050309160744.GN4017@Redstar.dorchain.net> <20050309202718.4f94b871@veagle.suse.cz> <20050310021724.GD17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <42302133.2060103@voicenet.com> <20050310103608.GB1416@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050310163007.GK17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20050316162448.GR17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:24:48AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > If no comment is given on how we should deal with > pci_dma_sync_single/pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu for 2.4 I'm just > going to put in a nasty ifdef there. Comemnts? How about just put: #ifndef pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu #define pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu pci_dma_sync_single #endif In one of the prism headers? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, chas williams - CONTRACTOR |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Francois Romieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |