[PATCH] ip link should print NO-CARRIER for !IFF_RUNNING && IFF_UP

[Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>]

> Till now I thought that IFF_RUNNING flag should be used for that. But some 
> time ago I tried to bug Stephen Hemminger about missing IFF_RUNNING flag in 
> ip output and got answer that IFF_RUNNING is BSD'ism and shouldn't be used 
> any more and /sys/class/net/eth0/carrier should be looked at.

The patch below changes ip link to print NO-CARRIER flag if there is
no carrier and the link is up.

# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
#   2005/03/14 17:12:43+01:00 tgraf@xxxxxxx 
#   [LINK] Report if link has no carrier
# 
# ip/ipaddress.c
#   2005/03/14 17:12:43+01:00 tgraf@xxxxxxx +2 -0
#   [LINK] Report if link has no carrier
# 
diff -Nru a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
--- a/ip/ipaddress.c    2005-03-14 17:13:59 +01:00
+++ b/ip/ipaddress.c    2005-03-14 17:13:59 +01:00
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@
 void print_link_flags(FILE *fp, unsigned flags, unsigned mdown)
 {
        fprintf(fp, "<");
+       if (flags & IFF_UP && !(flags & IFF_RUNNING))
+               fprintf(fp, "NO-CARRIER%s", flags ? "," : "");
        flags &= ~IFF_RUNNING;
 #define _PF(f) if (flags&IFF_##f) { \
                   flags &= ~IFF_##f ; \