| To: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Link detection |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:03:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200503141641.33510.hasso@estpak.ee> |
| References: | <200503141435.38227.hasso@estpak.ee> <20050314133216.GM31837@postel.suug.ch> <200503141641.33510.hasso@estpak.ee> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Hasso Tepper <200503141641.33510.hasso@xxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-14 16:41 > Forgot to answer this part. We already do all this. IFF_UP doesn't show > carrier status, but administrative status. IFF_RUNNING shows carrier > status. You're right, forget what I've said. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Link detection, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] ip link should print NO-CARRIER for !IFF_RUNNING && IFF_UP, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Link detection, Hasso Tepper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Link detection, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |