| To: | Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC INTRO 0/5] H-TCP congestion control |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:13:22 -0800 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, doug.leith@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4231E5B7.2010306@ev-en.org> |
| References: | <20050311160734.30424.67955.65942@galon.ev-en.org> <20050311094239.4c59c29d@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <4231E5B7.2010306@ev-en.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:38:47 +0000 Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That's why it's an RFC and not a request to add it. That's fine. Please in the future still state that there are legal hurdles to pass over before inclusion. I'll often apply RFC patches that I think are very good. :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: More IPSEC trouble, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x net driver fixes, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC INTRO 0/5] H-TCP congestion control, Baruch Even |
| Next by Thread: | [RFC PATCH 3/5] Adjust alpha to 2*(1-beta), Baruch Even |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |