| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:03:30 -0800 |
| Cc: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, baruch@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050309235728.GV31837@postel.suug.ch> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <20050303123811.4d934249@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <42278122.6000000@ev-en.org> <20050303133659.0d224e61.davem@davemloft.net> <42278554.2090902@ev-en.org> <20050303135718.2e1a0170.davem@davemloft.net> <422DC7CE.2040800@ev-en.org> <m1y8cykr7i.fsf@muc.de> <20050308100902.24b67b2f.davem@davemloft.net> <422DEE85.5010302@candelatech.com> <20050309235728.GV31837@postel.suug.ch> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:57:28 +0100 Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Of course...this might be things for 2.7 since lots of modules will probably > > be accessing these fields. Maybe to get started we could add macros to grab > > the flags and such so that when we finally do collapse things into a single > > flags field the external code doesn't have to know or care? Their may never be a 2.7, don't wait that long. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |