| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:51:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1110288879.1050.167.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <E1D7zBN-0004hX-00@smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <20050306173145.GQ31837@postel.suug.ch> <E1D81mg-0002rz-00@smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <m1y8d0mss2.fsf@muc.de> <3sp35g$7hpm0@smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <422C0B50.20500@mrv.com> <3sp35g$7rsc1@smtp04.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <1110288879.1050.167.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hello!
> Seems to me you are relying on obscurity of 127.x to achieve goals which
> you could achieve just as easily with a 10.x address or even a public
> address.
Using the same public block in all devices looks like the best solution.
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@xxxxxx> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"Object orientation is in the mind, not in the compiler." -- Alan Cox
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] neighbour tables configuration via rtnetlink, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |