Re: [6/*] [IPSEC] Fix xfrm[46]_update_pmtu to update top dst

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:08:42 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Let's also fix IPsec PMTU storage.  When we get an MTU update for an
> xfrm_dst, it should be done to the top dst, not the bottom dst.
> 
> For example, when we get a need-to-frag message for host C behind
> a our IPsec peer B, we should be updating the dst entry for C and
> not B as we do now.
> 
> I've removed the boundary checks since the same checks are done
> in ipv[46]/route.c already.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks Herbert.

Note that sometimes it is better to replace an "unnecessary as
determined by me" boundary check with a BUG() instead of
outright removal.  That way you get to test your assertion :)