| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | 6 Mar 2005 22:30:47 +0100 |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 2005 22:30:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050306204516.GR31837@postel.suug.ch> |
| References: | <E1D7zBN-0004hX-00@smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <E1D7zBN-0004hX-00@smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <20050306173145.GQ31837@postel.suug.ch> <E1D81mg-0002rz-00@smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net> <m1y8d0mss2.fsf@muc.de> <20050306204516.GR31837@postel.suug.ch> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:45:16PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > * Andi Kleen <m1y8d0mss2.fsf@xxxxxx> 2005-03-06 21:19 > > Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > There is no doubt that the 127.x net is treated in a special > > > way. If I have to believe what I just learned, then the 127 > > > > It is. 127.* is hardcoded in the routing engine and e.g. > > it won't accept outside packets with a loopback address. > > > > Most likely it's enough to change the "LOOPBACK" macro to allow > > parts of the Class A to be used for other purposes. > > Yes, it will work around the martian route and arp checks but > will probably break quite a few usersapce applications. Unlikely. glibc has an own LOOPBACK() and all modern distributions use separate kernel/user headers anyways. -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/3] fix buggy IEEE80211_CRYPT_* selects, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |