netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: support of IPv6 by NFS

To: Quantum Scientific <Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: support of IPv6 by NFS
From: Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 12:02:25 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200503010744.38339.Info@Quantum-Sci.com>
References: <42243F8D.5030302@bull.net> <200503010744.38339.Info@Quantum-Sci.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 07:44:37AM -0600, Quantum Scientific wrote:
> Also one must become an ip6tables expert in order to have a reasonably secure 
> firewall, because ip6tables and 6tables are dead, and Shorewall does not 
> support IPV6 security for some reason.  Another deterrant.

I have to oppose that statement.  ip6tables is not dead, it's alive.
We're even at the brink of submitting nf_conntrack, the new connection
tracking engine that covers ipv4 and ipv6, to the mainline kernel.

I'm running a number of ipv6 packet filters, and as of now we are not
aware of any known issues or bugs in the current ip6tables code base.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>                   http://gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>