| To: | Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:56:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> |
| References: | <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@smtp06.mrf.mail.rcn.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hello!
> Unfortunately, this does not work with the Linux stack, because the
> 127 net is treated (for good reasons I suppose) as a special net.
Is it really?
I've just tried
ip addr del 127.0.0.1/8 dev lo
ip addr add 127.0.0.1/24 dev lo
and `ping 127.1.2.3' is then happily sent along the default route.
Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@xxxxxx> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
Only dead fish swim with the stream.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/3] fix buggy IEEE80211_CRYPT_* selects, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] More ethtool support for sis900 (with locking), Daniele Venzano |
| Previous by Thread: | Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Zdenek Radouch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Zdenek Radouch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |