| To: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pppoe and receive checksum offload |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:04:24 +1100 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050228140401.GA27937@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <20050224155906.73890361@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050228113106.GA3268@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050228113938.GA3393@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050228140401.GA27937@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:04:01PM +0300, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: > > ppp_input() could do the same thing. It does not, hence suggested patch > is corrrect minimal solution. Agreed. We should use Stephen's patch for 2.6.11. For 2.6.12, does this patch look sane? As usual, I'd love to get some better names for the new helper functions. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Understanding the reason for placing a tcp_sock on stack in tcp network functions, Stephen Torri |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] WAN drivers fix: N2, C101, PCI200SYN - quite fatal, Krzysztof Halasa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: pppoe and receive checksum offload, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Next by Thread: | Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4249] New: KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (122), Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |