| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: pppoe and receive checksum offload |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:20:11 -0800 |
| Cc: | mostrows@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050224155906.73890361@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| References: | <20050224155906.73890361@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:59:06 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Someone reported a problem with skge hardware receive checksumming and PPPOE > but it looks like a generic problem. Since PPPOE adds additional header > bytes the hardware computed checksum will be wrong. > > Not sure if this is correct, but shouldn't pppoe be doing the following: Changing or expanding the link level headers should only mess up the hw checksum if you are using CHECKSUM_HW, is that what your skge driver is using? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Expose hardware stats via ethtool, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Lse-tech] Re: A common layer for Accounting packages, Evgeniy Polyakov |
| Previous by Thread: | pppoe and receive checksum offload, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: pppoe and receive checksum offload, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |