| To: | Quantum Scientific <Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:35:17 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200502271410.39611.Info@quantum-sci.com> |
| References: | <200502270928.44402.Info@Quantum-Sci.com> <200502271310.59682.Info@quantum-sci.com> <42222670.3090002@pobox.com> <200502271410.39611.Info@quantum-sci.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:10:39 -0600 Quantum Scientific <Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am skeptical about this assertion that the whole internet needs to be > hashed > if connection tracking. Connection tracking and NAT broke entirely the end-to-end host assumption that used to be valid on the internet. There are many very important optimizations we've had to disable by default just in TCP alone because of NAT. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support, Richard Dawe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |