netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [RFT] BIC TCP delayed ack compensation

To: "'Hubert Tonneau'" <hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Stephen Hemminger'" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "'cliff white'" <cliffw@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [RFT] BIC TCP delayed ack compensation
From: "Injong Rhee" <rhee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:37:35 -0500
Cc: "'Alexey Kuznetsov'" <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <052Q0TU11@server5.heliogroup.fr>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcUZMgHZZJ600QnDQLu2Rlc7tK+91QApGn8w

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hubert Tonneau [mailto:hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 5:23 PM
> 2.6.9 to 100 Mbps connected MacOSX: 15 seconds (for roughly 100 MB
> or data)
> 2.6.9 to gigabit connected MacOSX: 5 seconds
> 2.6.10-ac11 to 100 Mbps connected MacOSX: 325 seconds
> 2.6.10-ac11 to gigabit connected MacOSX: 5 seconds
> 2.6.10-ac11+BIC to 100 Mbps connected MacOSX: 620 seconds
> 2.6.10-ac11+BIC to gigabit connected MacOSX: 5 seconds

Another way to test whether this is related to the os or bic
implementation is to test it with our bic patch 1.1. + Linux 2.4. It
will tell whether the original implementation of BIC has something to
do with the performance with respect to MacOS. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>