| To: | Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug-hunting |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:30:00 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <421BBE7B.1050009@rapidforum.com> |
| References: | <421B4AB7.9030003@rapidforum.com> <20050222104448.31373a99.davem@davemloft.net> <421B8563.9030608@rapidforum.com> <20050222115114.0d0e568e.davem@davemloft.net> <421BBE7B.1050009@rapidforum.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:21:31 +0100 Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To reproduce this, you would have to create a server which is sending data to > 4000 non-blocking > sockets. It doesnt matter what you send. You should realize a slow-down the > more sockets you use. > You need Gigabit for this to appear. Please send us the exact test programs to run, not some general description of what "one should do" to reproduce the problem. This is exactly what is stalling this bug getting diagnosed properly and fixed. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2.6.11-rc4-netdev1 5/5] r8169: literate PCI ID, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 2.6.11-rc4-netdev1 5/5] r8169: literate PCI ID, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug-hunting, Christian Schmid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug-hunting, Christian Schmid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |