| To: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:36:53 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050221122540.GA13973@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| References: | <421925DB.2060602@rapidforum.com> <42192AAF.8020609@us.ibm.com> <42192CD5.5090401@rapidforum.com> <20050221090121.GA7478@outpost.ds9a.nl> <4219B99E.1000603@rapidforum.com> <20050221120223.GA30348@xi.wantstofly.org> <20050221122540.GA13973@outpost.ds9a.nl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:25:41PM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > > O_NONBLOCK send() is really nonblocking, but O_NONBLOCK sendfile() > > It is? So it returns EAGAIN if the data to be sent is not in the > page cache? No, it just blocks. It only returns EAGAIN if the data is in the page cache but the socket TX queue doesn't have enough space. (At least, when I last tried it.) --L |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Christian Schmid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |