| To: | Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:16:19 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200502202254.23511.jdmason@us.ibm.com> |
| References: | <200502161823.43562.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <200502201204.23468.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <20050220233405.GA14268@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200502202254.23511.jdmason@us.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> : [...] > My main problem with the above patch is that is assumes that there will > be a maximum of 2 descriptors per jumbo frame (which isn't the case). Where do you see such an assumption ? -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Frequent Oops on Shutdown 2.6.10, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up, Jon Mason |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/3] r8169: Jumbo Frames maximum size increase, Jon Mason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |