| To: | "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:11:21 +0100 |
| Cc: | robert.olsson@xxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050218134219.3f079110.rddunlap@osdl.org> |
| References: | <20050218134219.3f079110.rddunlap@osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> :
> (resend)
> Any comments this time?
Did I miss a simultaneous use of both buffers or could it be possible to
save an extra IP_NAME_SZ bytes of data with an evil ugly union ?
Btw, does anyone intend to fix the use of sleepable functions in
proc_thread_write() with spinlock ("thread_lock") held or should
I allocate it some cycles ?
--
Ueimor
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |