| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:13:23 +0300 |
| Cc: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru; b=cTXipgTGw4eWpG9R5c0YlEDNHJBqz3t0j7hGNglaBU2GfAaWlBYO5la+VYeEnA9A/KODMx7c8n1/5UidFLn/Oc0ctnOV/Fz+DQ4Yg3Q46JzIvb1uZj8yGMIhI0YqPtiTQVHWzubolJfi47tNbt6KFCGUJmBcGiZAJJXAjXPdNlI=; |
| In-reply-to: | <20050215152354.46a08d77.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <0525M9211@server5.heliogroup.fr> <20050211150420.74737b2e@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <20050215152354.46a08d77.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
Hello! > How mind boggling a heuristic. I bet it works by accident rather > than intention and purposeful design. Yup. It is definitely not an "ack avoidance algorithm" :-) :-) BTW it is still a puzzle why 2.6.9 works. With disabled TSO it should insert PSHs quite rarely, similarly to tso. And it is still a puzzle how that bunch of PSHless segments not followed by PSH appeared in TSO case. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: serious netpoll bug w/NAPI, Matt Mackall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPV4] Make loopback idev stick around, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |