netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IPSEC] Merge xfrm4_bundle_ok/xfrm6_bundle_ok/stale_bundle

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IPSEC] Merge xfrm4_bundle_ok/xfrm6_bundle_ok/stale_bundle
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:31:04 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050215225442.GA28142@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20050129123803.GA17390@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050215141743.1010f2e6.davem@davemloft.net> <20050215225442.GA28142@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:54:42 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Applied to my 2.6.12-pending tree.  Thanks a lot.
> 
> Sorry Dave, but that patch has a critical error in stale_bundle
> where I forgot to add an exclamation mark.

So the relative fix is to just add a "!" to the return statement
of stale_bundle() so that it reads:

        return !xfrm_bundle_ok((struct xfrm_dst *)dst, NULL, AF_UNSPEC);

right?  If so, I'll just add that to my tree.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>