| To: | Hubert Tonneau <hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:12:24 +0300 |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru; b=d1VXrbz/6oI4b6zKr9UTNeh8XrM654HUMkzewzvoS20qe2fe7pagvNb7ISYOz+yPjmDt83bn4jOay6NGcrVtBJ2qfrvmHaOlBs5onU/ek/reWtalGghvX1QD7DpduMi/Msq2XSGLKEmxQVCZrbeG03JSe5Yq/wt2J9B03zp+3r4=; |
| In-reply-to: | <0528GVO12@server5.heliogroup.fr> |
| References: | <0528GVO12@server5.heliogroup.fr> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
Hello! > ethtool -K eth1 tso off > the result is unchanged on 2.6.9 (14 seconds for 105 MB). > > After, > ethtool -K eth1 tso off > the result is also unchanged on 2.6.10-ac11 with no extra TCP patch (325 > seconds). Well, it means the theory was wrong... tso is innocent. To make a new theory we need a tcpdump of 2.6.10 with disabled tso. > it's a production server, I hope we can stay in its normal configuration now. TSO may be kept disabled. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit, Stephen Smalley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Hubert Tonneau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Hubert Tonneau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |