| To: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IP More Fragements bit problem. |
| From: | Vincent Roqueta <vincent.roqueta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:37:25 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200502140929.24379.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> |
| Organization: | BULL SA |
| References: | <200502111708.16024.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> <420CFD1F.2060701@us.ibm.com> <200502140929.24379.vincent.roqueta@ext.bull.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.6.1 |
Hello, > > > > Silly question, but are you absolutely sure that the original wasn't > > actually ABCDE? > > No, we are not sure. It is possible we lack the last fragement witch is not > marked with the MF bit. You are right. All fragments are not sent !!! And so the last fragment received is not the last fragment sent by the client. The MF is set and that is correct. Sorry :/ Vincent |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] VLAN over bonding, Olaf Kirch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] netlink check sender, Stephen Smalley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IP More Fragements bit problem., Vincent Roqueta |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] tg3: capacitive coupling detection fix, Michael Chan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |