| To: | rick.jones2@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4189] New: IPv6 link local addresses are not assigned correctly on multiple-bonding enviromrnts |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:17:48 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ikebe.takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, ctindel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <420C0D05.6020408@hp.com> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20050210122523.41276d5a.davem@davemloft.net> <20050211.092916.50162307.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <420C0D05.6020408@hp.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <420C0D05.6020408@xxxxxx> (at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:40:21 -0800), Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> says: > At present, for IPv4 if someone changes the MAC address of an interface, > existing TCP connections don't really care right? The ARP caches will be > updated with a new IPv4 to MAC translation and happiness and joy ensues. > > So, what would happen to TCP connections over IPv6 using link-local > addresses? > If the old address is taken away (deprecated), and a new address generated, > doesn't that mean that TCP connections (using link-local addresses anyway) > will > fail on a MAC change? One thing: we won't delete it but deprecate it. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4189] New: IPv6 link local addresses are not assigned correctly on multiple-bonding enviromrnts, Rick Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] [NETLINK] introduce netlink_check_skb function, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4189] New: IPv6 link local addresses are not assigned correctly on multiple-bonding enviromrnts, Rick Jones |
| Next by Thread: | Re: (usagi-users 03019) Re: sysctl net.ipv6.conf.eth0.use_tempaddr only recogniced on interface start?, Peter Bieringer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |