netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM de

To: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated)
From: Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:19:18 +0300
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usbatm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200502060133.j161XIj3007281@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Mail-followup-to: Roman Kagan <rkagan@xxxxxxx>, chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usbatm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20050204201327.GA2439@katya> <200502060133.j161XIj3007281@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:33:18PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> In message <20050204201327.GA2439@katya>,Roman Kagan writes:
> >initializing atm_dev.  I suspect the only way to fix it is to split the
> >atm_dev initialization into two stages, allocation and registration, as
> >it is done for net_device.
> 
> yeah which is why i just wanted to convert atm_dev to just be a netdevice.
> the code is already written and "stable".

Is it publically available?  Linux-ATM CVS appears to contain no
kernelspace code.  I'm just curious how atm_dev attributes are mapped to
net_device's, which doesn't look easy with the current atm_dev and
net_device.

Also, is it scheduled for inclusion in the mainline any time soon?  If
it is, maybe we shouldn't create an atm-specific user-visible interface
in sysfs and hotplug which is going to be obsoleted by the net generic
one in the near future?

Roman.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>