| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:02:42 -0800 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mirko.parthey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050205.195039.05988480.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| References: | <20050205061110.GA18275@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050204221344.247548cb.davem@davemloft.net> <20050205064643.GA29758@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050205.195039.05988480.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:50:39 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In article <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 5 Feb 2005 > 17:46:43 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > If we wanted to preserve the split device semantics, then we > > can create a local GC list in IPv6 so that it can search based > > on rt6i_idev as well as the other keys. Alternatively we can > > remove the dst->dev == dev check in dst_dev_event and dst_ifdown > > and move that test down to the individual ifdown functions. > > Yes, IPv6 needs "split device" semantics > (for per-device statistics such as Ip6InDelivers etc), > and I like later solution. Ok. I never read whether ipv6, like ipv4, is specified to support a model of host based ownership of addresses. Does anyone know? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), chas williams - CONTRACTOR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |