| To: | matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated) |
| From: | "chas williams - CONTRACTOR" <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:50:16 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, usbatm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr> of "Fri, 04 Feb 2005 19:27:07 +0100." <4203BE7B.2030503@free.fr> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In message <4203BE7B.2030503@xxxxxxx>,matthieu castet writes: >Shouldn't adev->signal == ATM_PHY_SIG_FOUND ? 1 : 0); be better : in the >case of ATM_PHY_SIG_UNKNOWN, it return 1... its intentional. if the atm device cant track the state of the link its probably best to just assume its up. |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] ieee80211 subsystem, James Ketrenos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), Roman Kagan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), matthieu castet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [RFC][PATCH] Very basic sysfs support for ATM devices (updated), Roman Kagan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |