| To: | Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Feb 2005 07:30:10 +1100 |
| Cc: | Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050203142705.GA11318@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> |
| References: | <20050131102920.GC4170@suse.de> <E1CvZo6-0001Bz-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20050203142705.GA11318@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 01:27:05AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Architectures should guarantee that any of the atomics and bitops that > return values order in both directions. So you dont need the > smp_mb__before_atomic_dec here. I wasn't aware of this requirement before. However, if this is so, why don't we get rid of the smp_mb__* macros? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: TCP-Protection is really a pain..., Christian Schmid |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem with "ESP: sha1 digestsize 20 != 0", Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] arp_queue: serializing unlink + kfree_skb, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |