netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenBSD Networking-related randomization port
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:42:18 -0500
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@xxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Hank Leininger <hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:25 +0100." <20050131165025.GN18316@stusta.de>
References: <1106932637.3778.92.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128100229.5c0e4ea1@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106937110.3864.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050128105217.1dc5ef42@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1106944492.3864.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1106945266.7776.41.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200501290915.j0T9FkVY012948@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20050131165025.GN18316@stusta.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:25 +0100, Adrian Bunk said:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:

> > Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told
> > that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while 
> > back.
> >...
> 
> At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible.

The copy of obsd_rand.c I have hass the problematic 4-clause version.  It looks
to me like we'd need to get Michael Shalayeff, Theodore T'so, and Niels Provos
to all agree to re-license under the 3-clause variant.  Using Arjan's code is
most likely the better approach...

Attachment: pgpnbNjrj9iQ4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>