netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:38:01 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1107174338.8021.123.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Organization: Elion Enterprises Ltd.
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> <200501311020.08337.hasso@estpak.ee> <1107174338.8021.123.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2
jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> > Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.
>
> Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier?
> What filter did you use?

http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012422.html

Got one answer to this in private that "AFAIK it isn't implemented yet".

-- 
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd.
WAN administrator

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>