| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement |
| From: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:20:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Organization: | Elion Enterprises Ltd. |
| References: | <1107123123.8021.80.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > 2) Allows for queueing incoming traffic for shaping instead of > dropping. I am not aware of any study that shows policing is > worse than shaping in achieving the end goal of rate control. > I would be interested if anyone is experimenting. Nevertheless, > this is still an alternative as opposed to making a system wide > ingress change. Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked. -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PROBLEM: nd_tbl not a public symbol in net/ipv6/ndisc.c, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad, Nigel Cunningham |
| Previous by Thread: | dummy as IMQ replacement, Jamal Hadi Salim |
| Next by Thread: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |