netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
From: Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:41:39 -0800
In-reply-to: <20050128001701.D22695@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@osdl.org> <20050123200315.A25351@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050124114853.A16971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050125193207.B30094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127082809.A20510@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@osdl.org> <16888.58622.376497.380197@robur.slu.se> <20050127164918.C3036@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127123326.2eafab35.davem@davemloft.net> <20050128001701.D22695@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:17:01AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 12:33:26PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > So they won't be listed in /proc/net/rt_cache (since they've been
> > removed from the lookup table) but they will be accounted for in
> > /proc/net/stat/rt_cache until the final release is done on the
> > routing cache object and it can be completely freed up.
> > 
> > Do you happen to be using IPV6 in any way by chance?
> 
> Yes.  Someone suggested this evening that there may have been a recent
> change to do with some IPv6 refcounting which may have caused this
> problem.  Is that something you can confirm?

FWIW, I do not use IPv6, and it is not compiled into the kernel.

Phil

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>