| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? |
| From: | Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:37:45 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <20050127164918.C3036@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <20050123011918.295db8e8.akpm@osdl.org> <20050123095608.GD16648@suse.de> <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@osdl.org> <20050123200315.A25351@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050124114853.A16971@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050125193207.B30094@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127082809.A20510@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050127004732.5d8e3f62.akpm@osdl.org> <16888.58622.376497.380197@robur.slu.se> <20050127164918.C3036@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:49:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > so obviously the GC does appear to be working - as can be seen from the > number of entries in /proc/net/rt_cache. However, the number of objects > in the slab cache does grow day on day. About 4 days ago, it was only > about 600 active objects. Now it's more than twice that, and it'll > continue increasing until it hits 8192, where upon it's game over. I can confirm the behavior you are seeing -- does seem to be a leak somewhere. Below from a heavily used gateway with 26 days uptime: # wc -l /proc/net/rt_cache ; grep ip_dst /proc/slabinfo 12870 /proc/net/rt_cache ip_dst_cache 53327 57855 Eventually I get the dst_cache overflow errors and have to reboot. Phil |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Where Linux 802.11x support needs work, Michael Renzmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Russell King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Russell King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |