| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gc_min_interval in milleseconds via /proc |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:38:54 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <16887.46410.873506.298630@robur.slu.se> |
| References: | <16887.46410.873506.298630@robur.slu.se> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:20:42 +0100 Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The second resolution is very inconvenient. Milleseconds would be nicer. It would, but since this is a user visible API we really can't change it. We could instead make another sysctl (perhaps name it something like "gc_min_interval_ms") to do what you propose, and then we'd keep the existing one around for compatibility. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [ATM] Fix flags type in lec_arp_expire_vcc, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] gc_min_interval in milleseconds via /proc, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1 of 5][ATM]: [fore200e] can't sleep in transmit routine, chas williams - CONTRACTOR |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |