netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RFC] string matching ematch

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] string matching ematch
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:26:09 -0800
Cc: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050126214119.GP31837@postel.suug.ch>
References: <20050126150714.GL31837@postel.suug.ch> <20050126130323.2dc10187.davem@davemloft.net> <20050126214119.GP31837@postel.suug.ch>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:41:19 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not sure if mixing stateful with stateless stuff is such of a good
> idea. I think it should be separated and have stateful filters only be
> executed when the flow matters, not packets.

I think keeping things totally stateless would be the best
idea.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow, Brandeburg, Jesse
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 2.6]: keep fragment queues private to each user, Patrick McHardy
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RFC] string matching ematch, Thomas Graf
Next by Thread:  Re: [RFC] string matching ematch, Thomas Graf
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]