Re: [RFC 2.6.10 5/22] xfrm: Attempt to offload bundled xfrm_states for outbound xfrms

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 00:53:01 -0500
David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've been reworking this area already to add the ability for the user to
> control which devices/states combinations can be offloaded, so this code
> will change. What do you think about just having the driver be
> responsible for ignoring offload requests when they don't make sense,
> like when the device is down, or in sleep mode?

That would be fine.

> BTW, xfrm_lookup() also calls stale_bundle(), which also relies on
> netif_running(), among other tests.

Good catch, hmmm... let me think about this case.