| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: skb_checksum_help |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:01:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050125014838.GA16637@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| References: | <20050123202715.281ac87c.davem@davemloft.net> <20050124121610.GP23931@postel.suug.ch> <41F50B6C.6010107@davidcoulson.net> <20050124151510.GV23931@postel.suug.ch> <20050124225423.GA15405@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050124234515.GA31837@postel.suug.ch> <20050125000759.GA15883@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050124164049.3b939791.davem@davemloft.net> <20050125014538.GB31837@postel.suug.ch> <20050125014838.GA16637@gondor.apana.org.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Herbert Xu <20050125014838.GA16637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-25 12:48 > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:45:38AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > > Still, one problem remains, even if ip_summed was incorrect, > > skb_checksum_help should never be called in dev_queue_xmit for the > > acenic driver since it sets NETIF_F_IP_CSUM. For some reason, features > > is set to 0 while checking for it. > > Didn't he say that he cleared the features bits in the acenic driver? He changed it back to the original version, I just checked with him. > BTW, is he using acenic for both the LAN and the WAN? If he's only > using it on the WAN side, then the LAN side might not be CSUM capable. The packets get routed back over the same physical interface. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David Coulson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |