| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: skb_checksum_help |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:38:07 -0800 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tgraf@xxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050123202715.281ac87c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| References: | <20050124005348.GL23931@postel.suug.ch> <E1Cst4o-0007bD-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20050123202715.281ac87c.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:27:15 -0800 "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If some code underruns > skb->data somehow while unfragging/refragging, that's a sure > fire way to corrupt things such as the skb->ip_summed field. Ignore this, I'm wrong. We allocate sk_buff and skb->data seperately, so this can't happen. I'm really showing my age, because many moons ago we did allocate them together :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: skb_checksum_help, Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: skb_checksum_help, Patrick McHardy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |