| To: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:44:18 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <41F18927.5020607@hp.com> |
| References: | <41F1516D.5010101@hp.com> <200501211358.53783.jdmason@us.ibm.com> <41F163AD.5070400@hp.com> <20050121124441.76cbbfb9.davem@davemloft.net> <41F17B7E.2020002@hp.com> <20050121141820.7d59a2d1.davem@davemloft.net> <41F186A8.9030805@hp.com> <41F18927.5020607@hp.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:58:47 -0800 Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> wrote: > Speaking of divisor values... is zero (0) supposed to be a legal value? The > sysctl seems to allow it but it does seem to behave a triffle strangely. The > initial TSO size appeared to be 2MSS. The value "0" behaves the same as "1". |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, Rick Jones |
| Next by Thread: | Re: on the wire behaviour of TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes?, rick jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |