| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:47:11 -0800 |
| Cc: | iod00d@xxxxxx, eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx, roland@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1104812294.1085.53.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <5cac192f0412230110628749e3@mail.gmail.com> <41CAF444.3000305@trash.net> <5cac192f04122408102129af43@mail.gmail.com> <1104240717.1100.66.camel@jzny.localdomain> <5cac192f0501021530672a908a@mail.gmail.com> <1104764660.1048.578.camel@jzny.localdomain> <52brc68q05.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f05010308414a25b548@mail.gmail.com> <527jmu8nbw.fsf@topspin.com> <5cac192f0501030907c755135@mail.gmail.com> <20050103171227.GD7370@esmail.cup.hp.com> <1104812294.1085.53.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 03 Jan 2005 23:18:14 -0500 jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 12:12, Grant Grundler wrote: > > > Some workloads that Jamal cares about (routing) only need 2 cpus. > > What bothers me is more the complexity this has introduced more than > the workload. OTOH, 1-2% improvement posted by Roland is good > justification. I think I'm going to put in something like Eric's patch and fix up the other LLTX drivers as per his sungem patch. There is a part of me that does want to yank LLTX for non-loopback out of the tree. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] kill needless addrconf lock in sctp., David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |