| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput |
| From: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:36:58 +0100 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Werner Almesberger <werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1106058592.1035.95.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <20050117152312.GC26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105976711.1078.1.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050117160539.GD26856@postel.suug.ch> <1105979807.1078.16.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050117165626.GE26856@postel.suug.ch> <1106002197.1046.19.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050118134406.GR26856@postel.suug.ch> <1106058592.1035.95.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:29:52AM -0500, jamal wrote: > > > Another thing that would be really neat is to have a iso like cli > > > (something like what zebra has) so you can go down the parse tree to > > > say the ematch level and just start typing away these commands. > > > Should probably be easy to rip off the vtysh stuff off zebra or > > > use libio or something along those lines to do this. > > > > I wouldn't call it easy but it's doable. > > I dont think its hard at all. It would take me, cycles pending, not more > than a day to whip something off libio. If you do this, please consider using Juniper config syntax instead of doing it the Cisco/quagga way. cheers, Lennert |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |