| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver. |
| From: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:04:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1105917038.1091.1041.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Organization: | Elion Enterprises Ltd. |
| References: | <OFB7F7E23F.EFB88418-ONC1256F7E.0031769E-C1256F7E.003270AD@de.ibm.com> <1105363092.1041.146.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1105917038.1091.1041.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
jamal wrote: > Didnt see anymore discussion on this - have we given up on it? I'm not competent enough about kernel internals to decide how this should be done in kernel. But I would like to clarify situation for me as Quagga developer. All this work is done to avoid sending stale packets to the network? Ie. there will be no change regarding socket blocking issue? Detecting carrier on/off and/or socket per interface is must be for us in user space to avoid socket blocking? I'm just trying to have full picture so I can put my priorities in place for next release. Thanks for your support, -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: remove c99ism, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFT] New syskonnect gigabit ether driver (skge), Benoit Boissinot |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver., Tommy Christensen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |