| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling) |
| From: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:32:38 +0200 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050116212124.GF22165@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| Organization: | Elion Enterprises Ltd. |
| References: | <20050112222437.GC14280@xi.wantstofly.org> <200501162237.33743.hasso@estpak.ee> <20050116212124.GF22165@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:37:33PM +0200, Hasso Tepper wrote: > > > > BTW, have you looked at any of the L2VPN stuff? browse the ietf web > > > > page. Some interesting stuff there. > > > > > > The L2TP RFC (RFC 2661, is that the same thing?) is 170kB, which > > > scared me off somewhat. > > > > If L2TP, then v3 probably - RFC3931. > > That RFC appears not to exist. Hmmm. Yes, seems that there was decision for yet another draft before 3931 was made official. Some sites contain info about it though. So official one at the moment: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-base-15.txt -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator |
| Previous by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling), Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |