Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures

["David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:10:05 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since there is no reclaim for sk_wmem_queued it doesn't happen
> there.
> 
> So taking out the adjustments should not cause any problems of
> sk_wmem_queued, theoretically :)

If we take out the skb->truesize adjustment, as the test patch does,
then we must take out the sk_wmem_queued and sk_forward_alloc
adjustments, as the test patch also does. :-)