| To: | Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Patch to Abstract Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) |
| From: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:02:50 -0800 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Fleming <afleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <D3652CF8-6571-11D9-821C-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> |
| Organization: | Open Source Development Lab |
| References: | <FC6D9B81-5514-11D9-8D51-000393C30512@freescale.com> <A3A281FF-5525-11D9-80ED-000393C30512@freescale.com> <D3652CF8-6571-11D9-821C-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:45:53 -0600 Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jeff, > > We were hoping for more feedback from netdev people on this patch: > > http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-12/msg00643.html > > thanks > > - kumar > > On Dec 23, 2004, at 3:00 PM, Andy Fleming wrote: > > > It has been suggested that I split the patch into 2 parts: gianfar > > specific stuff, and PHY specific stuff. > > > > Here is the result: > > <gfar_12232004.patch><phy_12232004.patch><ATT229010.txt> > It would be more valuable if there were cases where multiple different boards that use the same type of PHY chip were supported. Even better if it could subsume the existing MII code. Don't know enough about all the different flavors of hardware to know what combinations exist but it looks like there are different boards that have the same PHY chips. It looks like the FreeBSD tries to abstract this. -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Network driver test suite?, Cliff White |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFC] meta ematch, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Patch to Abstract Ethernet PHY support (using driver model), Kumar Gala |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Patch to Abstract Ethernet PHY support (using driver model), Andy Fleming |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |