| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 |
| From: | "Jeremy M. Guthrie" <jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:05:10 -0600 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501121445.51780.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> |
| Organization: | Berbee Information Networks |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501071416060.5818-100000@localhost.localdomain> <16869.34519.31321.977100@robur.slu.se> <200501121445.51780.jeremy.guthrie@berbee.com> |
| Reply-to: | jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.7.2 |
I am now getting some push back from the project manager on this performance problem. I am wondering if you think faster CPUs will a) help relieve the symptoms of this problem b) not help because now we will hit a '# of routes in the route-cache' problem c) or will help to a point till the # interrupts come back and bite us. -- -------------------------------------------------- Jeremy M. Guthrie jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx Senior Network Engineer Phone: 608-298-1061 Berbee Fax: 608-288-3007 5520 Research Park Drive NOC: 608-298-1102 Madison, WI 53711
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |