On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:22:10PM +0000, Steve Hill wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> >What I think we probably will have to do is just work torwards seeing if
> >we can come up with our own open wireless hardware. I know there was
> >a recent thread on lkml about an open video card -- anyone know where
> >that ended up?
>
> This may be a silly point, but there *was* good 802.11g hardware available
> which worked well with the fully open drivers.
Yes, that would be the Full MAC prism chipsets with the linux prism54 driver,
which I help maintain.
> I presume the
> manufacturers are moving to the "softmac" design instead because (for
> them) it is cheaper.
That is correct. They have already moved to the Softmac design and
you're lucky if you can buy FullMAC chipsets in stores now.
> However, the point is that the working designs are
> already there and it may be that buying the existing design which is being
> phased out is cheaper for the FOSS community than developing a whole new
> open device.
Definitely, I agree. Anyone have an idea of how much buying a wireless
chipset design may cost?
> Maybe it would be possible to convince one of the manufacturers that it's
> worth their while producing the older design hardware - if there is a
> single manufacturer who is making more or less the only hardware that is
> guaranteed to work under Linux there is probably quite a market for them.
I think they made the move because of economics as you mentioned
earlier. Under the current circumstances, I find it hard to be able to
Convince Conexant, for example, to start selling FullMAC chipsets again.
AFAICT the FullMAC chipsets have reached the END OF LIFE period.
Luis
--
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84 A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E
pgp1allleV8L1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|