| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PKT_SCHED]: Allow using nfmark as key in U32 classifier. |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:02:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1104763012.1047.524.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <20041231110836.GD32419@postel.suug.ch> <1104505142.1048.262.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041231153930.GN32419@postel.suug.ch> <1104511494.1048.303.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041231181153.GP32419@postel.suug.ch> <1104526311.1047.379.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050101121041.GR32419@postel.suug.ch> <1104622164.1048.444.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050102000612.GU32419@postel.suug.ch> <1104763012.1047.524.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1104763012.1047.524.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-03 09:36 > On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 19:06, Thomas Graf wrote: > > * jamal <1104622164.1048.444.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-01 18:29 > > > Does the ematch API include a dump()? I dont think it should - thats the > > > point i was making. Should be simple. > > > > Yes, although simple ematches are not required to implement dump. > > ok. I realize its optional - but i wouldnt even give the writter of > ematch the opportunity to write one. Want something more complex? write > a classifier. A classifier is at least 300 lines and you lose the ability to use the logic relations. > Again allowing for this may be overkill. Just send the same structure > the ematch needs in exactly the same form it needs it and you dont need > this. Compromise: If change/dump is not provided the api allocates and memcpy's itself resptively dumps m->data. Simple ematches don't have to care and can simple access m->data, more complex ematches can implement their own change/dump. Does that sound beter? > whats the .link for? I use list.h to chain ematch_ops and it's better to have it initialized. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PKT_SCHED]: Allow using nfmark as key in U32 classifier., jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PKT_SCHED]: Allow using nfmark as key in U32 classifier., jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |