On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 12:39:10AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for
> > > > > > completeness/correctness.
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > hint: look for "\n"
> > >
> > > hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8)
> > >
> >
> > Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll
> > take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have
> > things to do).
> > Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have.
> >
> >
> Ok, this is a bit embarresing. Looking at the patch now after getting some
> sleep it's quite obvious that it is wrong. I should have slept on it
> before sending it - sorry for the noise people.
nothing to be sorry about, and thanks for all
the work you are doing for the linux kernel ...
best,
Herbert
> --
> Jesper Juhl
>
>
>
>
|